Cutting weight and the effects it may or may not have on your performance is a topic of constant debate in the sport of wrestling.
Some coaches, parents, and wrestlers are for it. Others are adamantly against it.
However, I’d venture to say that most of the arguments are based on hearsay and personal experience.
So rather than write a post on my opinions on cutting weight, I’d rather present you with quick breakdowns of the most relevant research and let you form your own opinions.
Of course, this blog is always open to discussion. So after you read the studies, please feel free to add your thoughts in the comment section below or email me at dickie@wrestler-power.com with any questions you may have.
A Season of Wrestling and Weight Loss by Adolescent Wrestlers: Effect on Anaerobic Arm Power
Purpose
“The purpose of this study was to examine anaerobic power, skinfold estimates of relative body fat and body weight on adolescent wrestlers during a wrestling season.”
Subjects
15 high school wrestlers from Southside High School in Muncie, Indiana volunteered. All were within 4 months of turning or having just turned 16.
Procedures
They were tested four times throughout the year:
1. Preseason on October 13.
2. Early Season on December 7 and 14.
3. Late Season on January 13.
Note- The October and January testing was used to measure and compare the longitudinal effects of a season of weight loss and its effects on performance. The two dates in December were used to measure and compare the short term effects.
On December 7 the wrestlers were categorized as “rested” and did not have to make weight. December 14 fell on a day before a weigh-in following a weeks worth of practice.
It was also noted that a regular weight training program was not followed during the season.
Weight Lost
The wrestlers lost, on average, 8.4 pounds to make weight. A little over 5.5 pounds was lost between October 13 and December 7. The rest was dehydrated off within a 24-hour period.
Additionally, a 5% reduction in body weight and a 3% reduction in fat-free mass (muscle) was measured between October 13 and January 13.
Weight Loss On Power Output
No change was observed in anaerobic power between the dates of December 7 and 14. The researchers were interested in measuring the wrestlers when they had officially reached their weight class. However, they were unable to do so because the match was set to occur between 30-60 minutes after weigh-ins.
Additionally, no changes were measured between October 13 and January 13.
The researchers were surprised that there wasn’t an increase, due to the anaerobic demands of wrestling. However, they did mention that most research has suggested that an increase in power is usually associated with an increase in muscle mass. This would obviously be counterproductive for wrestlers trying to make weight.
My Thoughts
The first thing I’d like to bring up (which is a reoccurring issue in nearly all of the studies below)- is the fat free mass (muscle) lost in this study.
3% in 3 months!
Additionally, the researchers were surprised that power output didn’t increase due to the demands of wrestling. They felt that the drop in muscle mass may be the cause of this.
Based on this, I think it’s safe to say that if muscle was better maintained during the season then power output would have a much better chance of increasing.
Another thing that was noted was that there was no difference in power output between December 7 and 14. However, according to the study, the majority of the weight (5.5 of 8.4 pounds on average) had already been lost. That means that the wrestlers were only dehydrating a little less than 3 pounds that week to make weight (not a lot).
That is probably the reason behind statistically insignificant differences between the power output tests.
The reason I bring this up is because I don’t want someone to misinterpret this study and think power doesn’t suffer from cutting weight.
Study Referenced
Park, S.H., J. Roemmich, C. Horswill. A season of wrestling and weight loss by adolescent wrestlers: Effect on anaerobic arm power. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Volume 4, Number 1, pp 1-4. 1990.
Longitudinal Assessment of Anthropometric Growth in High School Wrestlers
Purpose
“…the purposes of the present longitudinal study were to examine yearly changes in anthropometric dimensions in high school wrestlers and compare these dimensions with those of national representative examples of adolescent males.”
Subjects
67 high school wrestlers from Class-A schools in Nebraska.
Procedures
Bodyweight, height, and 13 anthropometric (7 diameters and 6 circumference) measurements were taken on each of the wrestlers prior to the start of 3 consecutive seasons.
Summary Of Findings
The results were found to be consistent when compared to a larger cross-sectional study on a national sample of adolescent males (which compared 477). There were few differences in the anthropometric measurements between the two studies.
However, the researchers do bring up a good point in that they were measuring and comparing using age as the means of comparison and not “maturation status.” They feel this may produce different results.
Conclusion
“The present findings suggest that high school wrestling, which typically involves repeated bouts of weight cycling, does not affect anthropometric growth.”
My Thoughts
This study didn’t specifically cover performance and weight cutting. However, I thought everyone who reads this site would find it interesting because cutting weight and stunting growth is a big concern.
In all honesty, although this study is from 1997, I think it’s still relevant today. This is especially true if you look at what the average high school aged male eats (typically a bunch of crap).
I’d venture to guess that missing a couple bowls of sugary cereal or a few slices of pizza at lunch a couple times a week can’t be hurting the overall development of the average teenage guy.
Study Referenced
Housch, T., T. Evetovich, J. Stout, D. Housch, G. Johnson, M. Briese, S. Perry. Longitudinal assessment of anthropometric growth in high school wrestlers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 11(3), 159-162. 1997.
Sport-Seasonal Changes in Body Composition, Strength, and Power of College Wrestlers
Purpose
“The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of weight fluctuation on body composition, muscular strength, and anaerobic power in college wrestlers on 3 occasions during a 1-year period. They were compared to a control group of college wrestlers who did not report weight fluctuations throughout the season.”
Subjects
25 wrestlers who competed during the 1996-97 season at Division 1 Appalachian State University.
14 were classified as “weight cyclers” (those who cut at least 3.5% of their body weight). 11 were in the control group who did not cut weight. The 14 who cut weight wrestled at least 75% of the varsity matches scheduled for that season.
Testing
Wrestlers were tested at the end of September. This was 2 weeks after the first practice and 6 weeks before the first competition (no one was really cutting weight at this point).
They were tested again midseason (end of January). This was 4 days after a competition and 1 week before the next.
They were tested the third time at the end of April. This was 6 weeks after the end of the season.
Results
Body weight for weight cutters was 6% lower at midseason than at the start of the season.
Fat mass lost was consistent between both weight cutters and non-weight cutters.
Fat free mass (muscle) loss was significantly higher in weight cutters. In fact, 4.6 pounds of the 10.7 pounds, that was lost on average with weight cutters, was muscle.
All wrestlers were able to maintain their strength and power throughout the season. This was attributed to the resistance training program the team followed throughout the year. Unfortunately, no mention was made of the type of training program.
Conclusions
“We have concluded that college wrestlers who fluctuate their body weight throughout the competitive season lose a significant amount of fat free mass without a concomitant decrease in isometric strength or anaerobic power. …In any case, coaches, strength and conditioning specialists, athletic trainers, and physicians need to counsel these athletes on effective nutritional, training, and weight loss strategies that will minimize losses in FFM, maximize losses in body fat, and at the same time promote increases in muscular strength and power throughout the season.”
My Thoughts
This is another study that reveals a significant amount of fat free mass being lost during a wrestling season, this time at the Divsion 1 level.
The wrestlers in this study were able to maintain strength and power throughout the season. This was attributed to the implementation of an in-season resistance training program.
By the way if you’re looking for a few tips on effective nutritional and weight loss strategies that will help minimize the loss of muscle during the season read Wrestling Nutrition.
Study Referenced
Utter, A., M. Stone, H. O’Bryant, R. Summinski, B. Ward. Sport-seasonal changes in body composition, strength, and power of college wrestlers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 12(4), 266-271. 1998.
Effects Of A Competitive Wrestling Season On Body Composition, Strength, And Power In NCAA Division 3 College Wrestlers
Purpose
“The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a competitive wrestling season on body composition, muscular strength, and muscular power in NCAA Division 3 college wrestlers.”
Subjects
10 wrestlers from the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh with a minimum of 7 years experience volunteered.
This was a 2 year study. Therefore, 6 wrestlers were studied the first year and 4 were studied the second year.
Testing
3 testing periods were used.
The first was in late October. It was approximately 4 weeks before the start of the competitive season.
The second was in late January. It was 5 days after a dual meet and 5 days before the next match.
The third was in late March/early April. It was at least 4 weeks after the last match of the season.
Tests for muscular strength were measured by a 1 rep max squat and bench press. The next day power was tested using a power clean, seated med ball put, and a vertical jump.
Findings
Statistically significant losses in both the squat and bench press were found midseason when compared to both pre and post-season.
However, no significant differences existed between any of the 3 power tests.
All of the wrestlers were encouraged to follow a strength training program during the season. However, they all admitted that by mid-December they were no longer lifting.
My Thoughts
Usually the tests used for studies like this are isokinetic machines (which allow for the programming and control of the speed), Wingate upper body arm bike tests (essentially a 30-second all out sprint on an arm bike), and other tests that are not available to most coaches.
What I like about this study is that the lifts that were tested are commonly used in strength and power programs.
Again, much like in the studies above, power was found to be maintained while strength decreased.
**Note that once again power was maintained, but not increased. Power is a function of strength (and the speed at which you can apply it) and this study indicates that strength significantly decreases during the season. So it leads me to suspect that if strength were better maintained that power would stand a better chance of increasing during the season.
Although I didn’t mention it above, it is worth mentioning- the researchers found no statistically significant differences in weight or fat free mass during any of the 3 testing periods (the wrestlers in this study did not cut weight).
So even though the wrestlers in this study were adequately nourished throughout the season, strength still dropped significantly.
In summary, I think the following are the “take home” points for this study:
1. These wrestlers didn’t cut weight.
2. They stopped lifting by December.
3. Strength was significantly lower by mid-season testing while power was maintained.
Study Referenced
Schmidt, D. C. Piencikowski, R. Vandervest. Effects of a competitive wrestling season on body composition, strength, and power in national collegiate athletic association division III college wrestlers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 19(3), 505-508. 2005.
The Effect of a Competitive Wrestling Season on Body Weight, Hydration, and Muscular Performance in Collegiate Wrestlers
Purpose
“The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the effects in a collegiate wrestling season on body weight, hydration, and muscular performance.”
Subjects
12 Division 1 wrestlers from Oklahoma State University (from the 2005-2006 national championship season) volunteered.
Testing
A mid-season test was performed (although it wasn’t specified at what time) and a post-season test was performed 3 weeks after the National Championships.
All of the wrestlers followed a 3-day a week circuit training lifting schedule.
Findings
Bodyweight increased 6.9% only 3 weeks after the conclusion of the season.
There was no significant difference in hydration (1.024 mid-season vs. 1.022 post-season).
Peak torque (PT) and PT to bodyweight showed a significant increase post-season compared to mid-season.
Summary
“While sport-specific training is useful in most sports, wrestlers most likely obtain sufficient aerobic and anaerobic conditioning through practices and individual weight loss workouts.”
“Perhaps the strength and conditioning program should solely aim to maintain strength during the course of a season.”
My Thoughts
The summary points above speak for themselves.
Some other things I’d like to point out are as follows (from the “Findings” section):
1. These guys were, on average, cutting some serious weight as noted by the 6.9% increase in weight only 3 weeks after the NCAA tournament. Keep in mind that their hydration level really didn’t change from the mid-season test to the post-season test.
2. Even with the dramatic increase in bodyweight post-season, the peak torque to bodyweight ratio was still significantly higher post-season than it was in-season. This is probably one of the primary pieces of data used to formulate the 2 conclusions above.
Study Referenced
Buford, T., S. Rossi, D. Smith, M. O’Brien, C. Pickering. The effect of a competitive wrestling season on body weight, hydration, and muscular performance in collegiate wrestlers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 20(3), 689-692. 2006.
Effects of Self-Selected Mass Loss on Performance and Mood in Collegiate Wrestlers
Purpose
“…the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of self-selected mass loss on lower body power, upper body strength, and mood immediately before a meaningful competition.”
Subjects
16 Division 1 wrestlers agreed to participate.
The study required the wrestlers to have at least 3 months of regular training (from the way I read it, it sounds like pre-season workouts).
Testing was conducted 10, 6, 2, and 0 days before an intra-squad match (perhaps a wrestle-off).
The physical tests were measured at Day 10 and Day 0 after weighing in. Wrestlers were also weighed on Days 6 and 2.
Quick Stats
4 of the wrestlers lost 0-1.9% of their bodyweight. 6 lost 2.0-3.9% of their bodyweight. 6 lost 4.0+%.
Findings
There were three conclusions drawn from this study. First, rapid weight loss significantly increased confusion. This led researchers to suggest that this may be a factor that results in a decrease in performance in wrestlers who rapidly cut weight.
Second, rapid weight loss does not affect lower body power (as measured by a Wingate test on a stationary bike) or grip strength (using a grip dynamometer).
The third and much less surprising was that most of the weight that was lost occurred during the last 2 days.
My Thoughts
I was honestly a bit surprised to find that there wasn’t a significant decrease in power. There were 6 wrestlers who lost more than 4% of their bodyweight.
Study Referenced
Buford, T., S. Rossi, D. Smith, M. O’Brien, C. Pickering. Effects of self-selected mass loss on performance and mood in collegiate wrestlers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 25(4), 1010-1015. 2011.
The Physiological Basis of Wrestling: Implications for Conditioning Programs
This wasn’t a study, but rather a paper written by one of the top researchers in the world, William Kraemer. While it’s on the subject of conditioning, it had a relevant section dealing with weight loss that I’d like to share:
“Athletes in their freshman and sophomore years of high school may adversely affect their growth patterns at a time when puberty is just beginning, especially if restricted caloric intake is used in combination with progressive resistance training, whereby muscle breakdown occurs at a greater rate compared with muscle synthesis.”
Keep in mind that this is not consistent with the findings of the 2nd study I cite above.
“Thus the performance team (ie head coach, sports-medicine professional, strength and conditioning coach) must carefully determine the ideal weight class each year for the young athlete rather than suggest that a wrestler participate at the lowest possible weight class.”
Paper Referenced
Kraemer, W., J. Vescovi, P. Dixon. The physiological basis of wrestling: implications for conditioning programs. Strength and Conditioning Journal. 10-15. April 2004.
My Thoughts As A Whole
The first thing I found consistent among a couple of the studies was the significant loss in muscle throughout the season. I really think a more regimented lifting and eating plan can help to better address this.
The other thing I’d like to bring to your consideration is this- while power was maintained in every study, it’s important to keep in mind how it’s measured.
A Wingate test is simply an all out 30-second sprint on either a bike or arm bike. It’s commonly used to measure power in athletes. It’s an easy-to-implement test.
However, while power, according to a Wingate test, isn’t decreasing from cutting weight, let’s keep in mind what you may have to do after making weight…
Are you simply looking to be able to maintain power output over the course of 30-seconds?
Or are you looking to perform at your highest level for 6 (and maybe more) minutes?
So while the above research suggests power output is not negatively affected by cutting weight, remember that your performance on the mat may be. Therefore, be as strategic as possible when cutting.
Summary
Listen, cutting weight is a part of wrestling. There’s no way around it.
And while there may be a lot of people against it, it’s going to happen.
So rather than fight it, instead, educate yourself on how to do it better so that it has the smallest possible impact on your performance.
8 Comments. Leave new
awesome use of research to enforce your thoughts dickie. This is very helpful, now only if we could get all these kids educated!
Thanks Bryan, I appreciate the feedback. Fortunately the good thing I found in these studies is that there didn’t seem to be a lot of weight being cut (except in the one at Oklahoma State). Additionally, I found another study that I didn’t present in this post that basically looked at past data on weight loss in collegiate wrestlers (prior to the certification system put in place) as well as data after the system was implemented and the researchers concluded that the certification system was having a positive impact in terms of wrestlers both losing less weight and practicing better strategies to lose weight. But, as you know, there’s always work to be done.
Oh for sure it has done wonders. Im sure it used to be awful on wrestlers before the certification system. I know alot of vet wrestlers that told me how crazy the weight cuts used to be and i know it may have seemed “bad ass” to them but what they fail to recognize is: that kind of weight cutting can seriously damage your body if you keep doing it like they used to do it.
Yeah, I never had an idea as to how bad it was. I thought I suffered cutting 10-12 pounds, but last night I was talking to one of the dads of one of the wrestlers I train and we got to talking about this post and Jeff Reese came up. Apparently this dad knows Jeff’s brother and the way Jeff’s brother describes the amount of weight he was looking to cut on 2 days notice was just insane. It’s really unfortunate that such a terrible tragedy (along with the other deaths) happened which ultimately led to a, in my opinion, very reactive effort by the NCAA; but fortunately the seems to be working.
yeah it really is a shame. but the system is doing wonders. i remember trying to cut down from 220 (football weight) to 171 for wrestling since my wrestling teammate, nate schiedel (someone i think you know), was bumping up to 189. But i was 173 by certifications and wasnt allowed to lose anymore weight… i would say that was the only time i was mad at the system haha. But me and nate in the same class didnt work out too badly for us.
Ha, I didn’t know you used to be teammates with Nate. I’ve had the honor of being surprise bear hugged by him during warm-ups at one of the BU practices last summer…and let me tell you, it was no fun. I too had a situation in 10th grade where I tried to certify at 96 and weighed 97 or 98 and the nurse said I wasn’t able to get to 96; but it ended up working out because 103 ended up being enough of a cut that year based on my inexperience.
Hello, my friend…! I’am Rony Sivira of Venezuela.
See you publications, To plan to place an order, translation in spanish. No speech English. I’am traininng of wrestling olimpic in children and cadets. For pleaseto help…!
Hey Rony, sorry but I don’t have any of my eBooks translated yet. Do you know of a software you may be able to use?
What about if we were to work on a personalized plan together? Would we be able to use something to translate back and forth?